Early this month the Health Minister Nadine Dorries told the Health and Social Care Committee that a no fault compensation system is under review and could involve all claims against the NHS. Her comments were made to the Select Committee which is looking at the safety of maternity services in England following issues arising at Shrewsbury and Telford and East Kent NHS Trusts.Continue reading “No-fault compensation – could it work in the UK?”
Today will see the publication of the white paper said to revolutionise the health and care systems in the UK. Despite the health service struggling in the midst of a pandemic, the Heath Secretary confirms that now is “absolutely the time” to reform the NHS, intending to “reduce bureaucracy, to sweep away the legal barriers to the NHS delivering and integrate the NHS with social care…”.Continue reading “The health and care white paper and a vision for healthcare regulation”
As was highlighted in this blog, the Vaccines Minister Nadhim Zahawi has announced a ‘targeted and time limited state backed indemnity’ for care homes which are registered as Designated Settings or intending to register as a Designated Setting, and which are unable to obtain commercial insurance. The question is, will this relatively short-term move have the impact that is needed right now to protect the NHS and care sector?
So what is a Designated Setting?
It is essentially a care home which has applied and been assessed by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) as an appropriate setting to care for COVID-19 positive patients who are discharged from the NHS and who no longer require an acute hospital bed. The objective is of course to relieve pressure on the NHS as it copes with the winter crisis.
The aim is that there is at least one Designated Setting in each local authority ‘as soon as possible’.
How are the care homes assessed?
The care homes are assessed by the CQC using its Infection Prevention and Control framework (IPC). Assessments are made to ensure patients are being physically separated, that there is a dedicated workforce and appropriate emphasis on ventilation.
The CQC is using an ‘eight ticks‘ approach in order to give the public an overview as to factors such as the availability of adequate PPE, that staff are properly trained to deal with outbreaks and the appropriate processes needed, that shielding is being complied with and hygiene practice is promoted.
How many Designated Settings are there currently?
As at 12 January there were 135 approved Designated Settings providing a total of 1,624 approved beds. The coverage across the country is however currently variable – there are only 87 approved beds for instance in London, but 381 in Yorkshire and the Humber.
Testing of CQC inspectors
Up until now CQC inspectors were not tested for COVID which was a source of concern for many. It is now proposed that inspectors will be tested weekly with the testing being rolled out in the coming weeks. It is not clear however why there is to be a delay since care home staff are already being regularly tested.
What is the state indemnity scheme going to cover?
The indemnity will cover claims for clinical negligence and employers’ and public liability where the care home provider operating a Designated Setting has been unable to secure such cover in the commercial insurance market..
The clinical negligence aspect will be covered by the Clinical Negligence Scheme for Trusts (CNST) supervised by the DHSC and NHS Resolution.
However, as things stand this indemnity will be in place only until March 2021 and is to be reviewed in mid-February.
How helpful is this scheme going to be for the care home sector?
One of the concerns for care home managers seeking to participate will no doubt be the ability to provide a dedicated COVID- 19 workforce, particularly given the pressures on staffing already apparent.
If Designated Settings are to be contained within care homes also containing those who have not been exposed to COVID-19, reassurance around dedicated staff, PPE provision, social distancing and adequate ventilation may not be enough to convince service users that they are in fact completely safe.
It remains to be seen how successful the scheme will be for care home operators who have difficulty in obtaining commercial insurance cover for COVID related claims. The impact on the NHS of course will depend on just how successful this scheme actually is in freeing up acute beds.
Given however that the indemnity scheme is limited in its time frame and scope the concern must be that it will simply be insufficient to make any real impact on the problem.
Following the joint statement published by regulators at the start of the pandemic, on 14 January 2021, the GDC published supplementary advice to decision makers on the factors to be taken into account when considering complaints arising during the pandemic.
The advice, which is to be welcomed, sets out the various contextual matters to be taken into account by decision makers which include environmental issues and resource, guidelines and protocols.Continue reading “New GDC guidance on factors to be taken into account – a step in the right direction?”
As shown in the BLM Policy blog of 15 December 2020 (link here), COVID-19 (C-19) compensation claims appear to be gathering some momentum although, at this point, the total number of such claims that have been officially registered with the Compensation Recovery Unit of the UK Department for Work & Pensions remains very low.
As we have noted previously, new and untested questions on standard of care and legal causation would likely arise in any litigated C-19 claim. In this blog, we re-visit certain aspects of these potential questions in the context of vaccinations for care home staff.Continue reading “Potential impact of carers refusing to be vaccinated”
During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare regulators reviewed their processes and made a joint commitment to take human and environmental factors into consideration when determining whether a complaint/incident reached the threshold for fitness to practise action.
In addition, the country saw an outpouring of support and affection for healthcare practitioners working hard to treat patients in hugely pressured and trying circumstances.
Alongside the guidance on relevant factors to consider during the life of an investigation, emergency registration was granted to recently retired practitioners under emergency powers granted by the Coronavirus Act 2020. Notably, the GMC introduced guidance for decision makers on requests to relax or revoke sanctions or IOT orders in response to COVID-19 which allowed those whose registration was subject to restriction to apply for an early review of that restriction.
Do these changes reflect a change in what may be determined in the public interest and can healthcare professionals be reassured that such changes will remain in place once the impact of the pandemic has subsided? It may be more apposite to ask whether they should remain in place.Continue reading “COVID-19: does the response of the regulators call for a fresh approach?”